The Centre for the History of European Discourses was incorporated in the Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities in August 2015.

The information in this website is therefore out of date but retained for archival and staff purposes.

After Foucault, it has come to be widely accepted that "sexuality" as we know it took shape at the end of the nineteenth century. Indeed, when in 1897 Havelock Ellis declared sex to be "the central problem of life", he was focussing and confirming a vast general tendency in European and North American thinking of the time. Hysteria, widely regarded since the mid-nineteenth century as a feminine malady, was considered by some to be a veritable epidemic, as were forms of neurasthenic effeminacy and degenerate loss of willpower in men. 1900 came to be known, in Paris at least, as the season of Sappho. A catalogue of sexual "perversions" was being extended and refined by the new "science" of sexology. Psychoanalysis was to find both its task and its raison d'être in the exquisitely complex study of psycho-sexuality. This was the time when, in Foucaldian terms, circuits of knowledge and power linked truth to sexuality, and sexuality, almost always, to pathology.

The fin de siècle is thus a particularly fertile terrain for exploring the emergence of "sexuality" as an object of medical attention and a subject for aesthetic experimentation. Nevertheless, historical and literary scholars have rarely confronted the close interplay between medical and literary discourses during this period. Following the lead of cross-disciplinary scholars like Janet Beizer, Carolyn Dean, Vernon Rosario, and Judith Walkowitz, this conference seeks to bridge the gap between academic disciplines, connecting, on the one hand, scholars primarily concerned with the intensive reading of texts, and on the other, scholars whose overriding preoccupation is with cultural-discursive extension. Our assumption, and our claim, is that fin-de-siècle sexuality provides a quite precise topos for the close collaboration of these two groups. Sharing the topic may permit, in addition, a better understanding of the disciplinary habits that currently divide and organise the history of discourses, and the history of sexuality in particular.

On this site